Moral Realism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
2005年10月3日 · Moral realists are those who think that, in these respects, things should be taken at face value—moral claims do purport to report facts and are true if they get the facts right. Moreover, they hold, at least some moral claims actually are true.
Moral realism - Wikipedia
Moral realism (also ethical realism) is the position that ethical sentences express propositions that refer to objective features of the world (that is, features independent of subjective opinion), some of which may be true to the extent that they report those features accurately.
Moral Realism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Moral realists must find a way for not only rejecting the quasi-realist’s debunking of the disagreements between the traditional realist and the antirealist, but also a way for establishing “real” moral comforts.
Moral realism - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Moral realism is the view that there are facts of the matter about which actions are right and which wrong, and about which things are good and which bad. But behind this bald statement lies a wealth of complexity.
Realism - Moral, Objectivity, Truth | Britannica
Realism - Moral, Objectivity, Truth: According to moral realists, statements about what actions are morally required or permissible and statements about what dispositions or character traits are morally virtuous or vicious (and so on) are not mere expressions of subjective preferences but are objectively true or false according as they ...
Moral Realism - (Ethics) - Vocab, Definition, Explanations - Fiveable
Moral realism posits that moral facts exist independently of human opinion, making it a foundational concept for ethical theories seeking objective standards. It stands in contrast to non-cognitivist views, which argue that moral statements do not convey truth but rather express emotional responses or prescriptions.
Introduction | The Oxford Handbook of Moral Realism - Oxford …
2023年9月18日 · What is moral realism? And why does it matter whether moral realism is true? These are the questions we will address in this brief introduction. We will also explain the organization of the volume. We begin intuitively, with what we take to be the basic idea that underlies moral realism, and with several considerations that we think motivate it.
Moral realists hold that there are moral facts, that it is in light of these facts that peoples’ moral judgments are true or false, and that the facts being what they are (and so the judgments being true, when they are) is not merely a reflection of our thinking the facts are one way or another.
Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics
This book is a systematic and constructive treatment of a number of traditional issues at the foundation of ethics, the possibility and nature of moral knowledge, the relationship between the moral point of view and a scientific or naturalistic world view, the nature of moral value and obligation, and the role of morality in a person's rational ...
moral realism is obviously the correct position, even as they recognize that people regularly disagree deeply about just what the moral facts are ( see properties, moral; truth in ethics).
- 某些结果已被删除