Elster, which held the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) application of Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act to reject the mark TRUMP TOO SMALL was unconstitutional. The High Court today ...

Holder decision,[1] the Supreme Court of the United States struck down the coverage formula of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act ... [29] 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971(a)(2)(C) & (3)(B), 1973b(c)(1 ...

At issue in Brnovich v. DNC and Arizona Republican Party v. DNC is nothing less than the future of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the nationwide prohibition of any election regulation that ...

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is widely considered to be the single most important federal statute protecting the right to vote. The act contains a number of important provisions, but today it is ...

The ruling in an Arkansas redistricting lawsuit may set up the next U.S. Supreme Court fight that could further limit the reach of the Voting Rights Act's protections for people of color.

A section of advocates practising in the ... to recommend the Central Government to repeal Section 2(c) of The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. In view of the Supreme Court finding Senior Advocate ...

Going against decades of precedent, state officials argued in last year's most high-profile case about Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act that race should not be taken into account when maps of ...

MUMBAI: Bombay high court has held that offences of infringement of copyright under Copyright Act and of falsely applying any trademark under the Trade Marks Act are ...

The Karnataka high court on Tuesday ordered notice to the ministry of law and justice on a PIL challenging the constitutional validity of Section 2(c)(i) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 on the ...