According to a report from Axios, the Trump administration has canceled funding and contracts to Springer Nature, including ...

China's scientific journals have made significant strides in their academic influence and quality improvements over the past decade, according to the Blue Book on China's Scientific Journal ...

Scientific journals have a credibility problem. Here’s how to fix it. Four experts on how to discredit the so-called “paper mills” while keeping research open to everyone.

Retraction Watch, a website that monitors journals and pushes for greater transparency, documented 41 retractions in scientific journals in 2000. Last year, the number was 5,128.

There have been at least 28 mass resignations of editors from journals since 2020, according to Retraction Watch, often driven by disputes with publishers over open-access fees and heavy workloads.

Scientists Take on Scholarly Journals With Walkouts, Scathing Letters and Delistings Some scientists say the for-profit industry’s fast growth makes it harder to police fraud and low-quality work By ...

This fall, scientists and scientific journals are facing a new reality. Covid-19 is no longer the driving issue of the election, and Americans’ trust in science has declined since 2020. ...

Aston University biostatistician Dr. Dan Green has identified the top ten errors he commonly sees in research papers in his ...

Scientific American is the essential guide to the most awe-inspiring advances in science and ... Mortality among Scientific Journals. November 21, 1857. Share on Facebook. Share on Twitter. Share ...

Opinion An epidemic of scientific fakery threatens to overwhelm publishers. More than 10,000 scientific papers were retracted last year as “paper mills” exploit the system.