In this Munk Debate, bestselling author Michael Eric Dyson and journalist and commentator Michelle Goldberg argue that political correctness promotes diverse societies and social progress.

Is political correctness a threat to free speech or a positive force for social justice? The May 18, 2018 Munk Debate sees Michael Eric Dyson, Michelle Goldberg, Stephen Fry, and Dr Jordan B ...

Is political correctness a threat to free speech or a positive force for social justice? Michael Eric Dyson, Michelle Goldberg, Stephen Fry, and Dr Jordan B Peterson debate the state and future of ...

Progressives respond that ‘what you call political correctness, I call progress,’ which is the resolution of Friday’s Munk debate at Toronto’s Roy Thomson Hall. Speaking for the resolution ...

By Dorian Lynskey Recently, I came across a surprising book beside the tills in Waterstones. Political Correctness Gone Mad? was surprising because it wasn’t really a book, but a transcript of last ...

The debate was moderated by Munk Debates chair Rudyard Griffiths ... Going into the debate, 36 per cebt of attendees agreed that political correctness was a form of progress, while 64 per cent ...

At the center of the debate was a concern for fostering free discourse. “The beauty of political correctness is that it provides the equity for marginalized groups to be able to advocate for ...

These are the Munk Debates – an ongoing series of discussions tackling the most influential issues of our day. This month's debate is the ninth event since it was founded in 2008.

About 30 students joined a Political Union debate Monday to argue the premise that political correctness on college campuses hinders learning. The debate, located at The Buffett Institute ...

Political correctness seems to be at the center of more debates lately, if not explicitly then implicitly. So it’s worthwhile to revisit the historical roots of the P.C. debate, to try to see ...